← docsCode Quality

/thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review

The strictest review. No warnings — only pass or fail.

Extremely strict maintainability review designed for abstract, complex, or high-risk code. Checks coupling, naming, abstraction level, architectural coherence, and correctness. Every finding is severity-ranked with named issues, not suggestions.

Category

Code Quality

Execution

File-by-file → severity-ranked findings

Goal

Review code at maximum strictness and produce a severity-ranked findings table that blocks release on any Blocker or High issue.

Scope

Applies to

  • +Complex business logic
  • +Architectural changes
  • +High-risk areas (payments, auth, data migration)

Does not cover

  • −Trivial changes (typo fixes)
  • −Test-only changes

Triggers

"Thermo-nuclear review""Strict code review""Maximum strictness review"Phase 8 of radioactive

Inputs

  • →Files to review (or git diff scope)
  • →Project coding standards
  • →Architecture context

Invariants

  • 01Every finding cites file:line
  • 02No stylistic opinions — only correctness and maintainability
  • 03Findings are severity-ranked: Blocker > High > Medium > Low

Procedure

  1. Step 1Read project coding standards and architecture context
  2. Step 2For each file: analyze correctness, security, coupling, naming, abstraction
  3. Step 3Assign severity to each finding
  4. Step 4Produce findings table
  5. Step 5Issue verdict: APPROVED (zero Blocker/High) or CHANGES REQUESTED

Outputs

  • ▸Findings table with file:line, severity, description
  • ▸Verdict: APPROVED or CHANGES REQUESTED

Review Gate

  • [ ]Every finding has file:line citation
  • [ ]No stylistic-only findings
  • [ ]Verdict severity matches finding distribution